David Wiley has a new post responding to Steve Carson and Stephen Downes, who suggest OER adoption is sluggish because Wiley is not considering linking as adoption. From the post:
When you define “adoption” as linking, there is literally no need to concern yourself with licensing or openness. When you define adoption as linking, you undermine everything that separates OER from the other resources on the web.
Pingback: More on Adoption as Linking |