Monthly Archives: October 2009

Authorship in Collaborative Efforts

Glyn Moody has a new post discussing The Polymath Project, which was a collaborative effort to prove a theorem. Moody uses this project to discuss issues of attribution and authorship within a collaborative environment. From the post:

So far, attribution hasn’t really been a problem, since everyone who contributes is acknowledged – for example through the discussions around the code. Similarly, preservation is dealt with through the tools for source code maanagement and the discussion lists. But there are crucial questions of long-term preservation – not least for historical purposes – which are not really being addressed, even by the longest-established open projects like GNU.

OCW Spurs Competition

Bill Tucker at the Quick and the Ed has a new post responding to criticisms of the Obama administration’s plans to fund OER for high school and community college courses (reported by OEN). Tucker argues that the funding will not reduce competition, but increase it. From the post:

In fact, given the rigidity of the higher education market, the only way to open up the sector may be for a new entrant to create an entirely different frame of competition.

U.S. Government Printing Office Fails to Award Contract

Gavin Baker at Open Access News is reporting that the U.S. Government Printing Office has not awarded a contract for a massive digitization project. The Internet Archive made a bid, but it was not accepted for unknown reasons. From the article:

The Internet Archive filed a proposal, partnering with the Law Library Microform Consortium and the University of Florida Libraries. The proposal seems to meet the major requirements of the RFP: most importantly, that the digitization would occur at no cost to the government. In addition to providing free digital copies of the files to GPO, the Internet Archive also proposed to host them OA online.

OCW Development at Georgetown

Lillian Kaiser at The Georgetown Voice has a new article on OpenCourseWare development at Georgetown. Kaiser contrasts MIT OCW’s resources with Georgetown, which has one graduate student allocated for its efforts. From the article:

“We’ve got the lemonade stand set up, so to speak. That’s all it is right now, but it’s a great beginning.”

Open 2009 Symposium

Hans Põldoja has tweeted about Open 2009, a symposium held at the Media Lab University of Art and Design Helsinki on Nov. 5-6. The symposium will cover topics related to openness.

UNESCO OER Toolkit

Result of a community effort, but mostly developed by Philipp Schmidt, UNESCO has launched, on  the 15 October 2009he UNESCO OER Toolkit (with support from the UNESCO Communications and Information Sector). This toolkit has special focus on academics and institutions from  developing countries — who are interested in participating in open education projects.

OVERVIEW — Most of the Toolkit is designed for academics who are interested in finding and using OER in the courses they teach, or who wish to publish OER that they have developed. Some sections are aimed at institutional decision-makers and academics that interested in setting up a more formal OER project. These projects may start with just a few interested academics but, as they grow, institutional policies, funding and legal constraints become more relevant.

Individuals who are not aiming to set up a institutional project may nonetheless be interested to read the whole document. Likewise, institutional planners, IT staff or librarians who are interested in setting up an OER project would benefit from understanding the academic’s perspective.

International Open Education Efforts

Simmi Aujla and Ben Terris at The Chronicle of Higher Education have a new article on international open education efforts. The article seems to take a more positive angle than yesterday’s article. From international open education article:

In India, the focus is directly on students. The country’s most rigorous technology universities have been posting videos of lectures since 2007, hoping that millions of students at its less elite schools will benefit. Videos of about 110 courses at the public institutions are available online, with 40 hours available per course.

Planning Mozilla Education

Mark Surman has a new post on the plans for Mozilla education. Surman emphasizes the need for community in learning. From the post:

The first is straightforward: providing people with high quality, easy to access learning opportunities helps with Mozilla’s goal of promoting openness and participation as a part of Internet life.

Thanks to KnewtonInc on Twitter for the link.

History of Documentation Licensing

Mike Linksvayer at Creative Commons is reporting that the Software Freedom Law Show had dedicated an episode to the history of documentation. The episode discusses a range of licenses including CC0, GFDL and CC BY-ND. From the post:

One quick addendum to the show, in which the hosts wonder if CC has a public versioning process. The answer is yes — see a a list of CC blog posts over the course of development of our 3.0 licenses. The next, eventual versioning will be even more public and rigorous, just as the GPLv3 had a development process far more in depth than that of any public software license that preceded it.

Incorporating Fully Copyrighted Material into OER

Jane Park at Creative commons has a new post on the legal problems in incorporating fully copyrighted material into OER. The post does not go into the, perhaps, larger issue of Creative Commons license incompatibility. From the post:

But the inclusion of third party content that is not under the same terms of the license changes the global nature of OER, potentially walling it off from use in other countries. Thus, ccLearn has developed some practical recommendations and alternatives for those OER creators who are concerned with the global reach and impact of their works.

A related document is available through Scribd.