Tony Hirst has a new post explaining the need for “Open Training Resources.” Hirst seems to be suggesting that Open Training Resources are more task-centered, as opposed to OER, which is about nebulous educational purposes. From the post:
So here’s where I’m at – OERs are probably [possibly?] not that useful. But open training materials potentially are.
Note: OpenEdBlogger has taken the wrong meaning from Hirst’s articles before. Clarifying comments are welcome if that is the case.
That’s about right, I think…?!