<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rating Collaborative Textbook Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openeducationnews.org/2009/08/17/rating-collaborative-textbook-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openeducationnews.org/2009/08/17/rating-collaborative-textbook-development/</link>
	<description>Monitoring news related to open education around the globe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 01:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iterating toward openness &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When the &#8220;Wiki Way&#8221; = Poor Quality</title>
		<link>http://openeducationnews.org/2009/08/17/rating-collaborative-textbook-development/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iterating toward openness &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When the &#8220;Wiki Way&#8221; = Poor Quality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openeducationnews.org/?p=3451#comment-1395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Open Education News points to a Scientific American article covering the California Learning Resource Network&#8217;s reviews of 16 open science and math textbooks for coverage of CA state standards. These reviews support schools making adoption decisions about whether or not open textbooks are of sufficient breadth and quality to be formally adopted in place of commercial textbooks. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Open Education News points to a Scientific American article covering the California Learning Resource Network&#8217;s reviews of 16 open science and math textbooks for coverage of CA state standards. These reviews support schools making adoption decisions about whether or not open textbooks are of sufficient breadth and quality to be formally adopted in place of commercial textbooks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

