Rating Collaborative Textbook Development

Brendan Borrell at Scientific American has a new article discussing how well collaborative textbooks fared in California’s recent selection of electronic textbooks (reported by OEN). Borrell’s conclusion is that the more ‘wiki-like’ the development, the poorer it did in California’s selection process. From the article:

So far, the front-runners were typically written by just one or several authors, and the one major organization that has fully embraced a Wiki approach failed to impress CLRN reviewers.

Thanks to Internet Savings Network for the link.


One Response to Rating Collaborative Textbook Development

  1. Pingback: iterating toward openness » Blog Archive » When the “Wiki Way” = Poor Quality

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>