Monthly Archives: March 2009

Lessig Concerned About House Bill

Larry Lessig has written a blog post about a piece of U.S. legislation called the “Fair Copyright in Research Act,” which would prevent organizations that receive government funds for research from mandating open access. Unsurprisingly, Lessig is opposed to the bill, and says:

Pushed by scientists everywhere, the NIH and other government agencies were increasingly exploring this obviously better model for spreading knowledge. Proprietary publishers, however, didn’t like it. And so rather than competing in the traditional way, they’ve adopted the increasingly Washington way of competition — they’ve gone to Congress to get a law to ban the business model they don’t like. If H.R. 801 is passed, the government can’t even experiment with supporting publishing models that assure that the people who have paid for the research can actually access it. Instead, if Conyers has his way, we’ll pay for the research twice.

Boston University Publishes Research Openly

According to The Times Higher Education, Boston University is making its research free available online, rather than publishing through peer-reviewed journals. The move has been criticized by some concerned over the quality of research being made available. John Tagler, a Director in the American Association of Publishers stated:

“There’s a real difference between posting (research) on your university website versus going through a peer review, which gives it certification among international experts.”

FairShare Site to Help Track Creative Commons Works

The Attributor Corporation announced the beta version of FairShare yesterday. The site will allow users to declare the license of a work using its RSS feed. It will also track usage of that work. From the Attributor Corporation blog:

FairShare was built to enable The Sharing Economy – specifically, to make it possible for millions of other people around the world to reuse content in a way that provides value back to the original content creator . . . value that each creator can define herself.

CertificationMap.com Shares Teacher Certification Requirements

The Rossier School of Education has sponsored CertificationMap.com, which is a Web site that shows teacher certification requirements by state. From the site:

we realized a number of counter-intuitive aspects of the certification process early on.

For instance:

1. There wasn’t a simple, comprehensive source for certification information
2. The only real place to get the information was on your states education website; When was the last time you tried navigating one of those things?
3. The requirements vary wildly by state, and change frequently.

As a result, we ended up having to compile all of this information ourselves. It took weeks. We lost good men, women, and interns along the way. But when the dust finally settled, we realized that we put together the single most comprehensive guide to the teacher certification process in the country.

Peter Suber interviewed on Radio Berkman

Peter Suber, Senior Researcher at SPARC, is interviewed by Radio Berkman, the podcast for Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School. From a partial transcript of the interview:

where does your research go once it’s published in that journal? Your earthshattering analysis of Don Quixote’s taboo relationship with Sancho Panza; your innovative recipe for rocket fuel made from household dryer lint; your study of the surprising linkages between papercuts and mad cow disease; all of that research you poured years into, is – let’s face it – most likely destined for a journal that will gather dust on library shelves. And that’s if you’re lucky.

Patterns in Problems with Distance Education in Developing Nations

Wright, Dhanarajan & Reju examine the common problems that face distance educators in developing nations in the new issue of The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL). Some of these issues include lack of infrastructure, justifying online interventions and cultural imperialism. From the article:

Despite the challenges described in this article, new institutions are launched each year, existing traditional institutions are expanding their open learning options, and enrolment in distance education courses continues in both the developed and developing worlds. The continued growth and success of distance education institutions will depend on the extent to which issues covered in this article are addressed, as they all affect the quality of the learning experience provided to students. For those in developing and emerging nations, distance education is the promise of a better life, not just an enhancement of existing educational offerings.

A Decade in Development

Professor David Wiley and Seth Gurell review the history of OER in the past ten years in the latest issue of Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning. In addition to reviewing the past history of OER, Wiley and Gurell also examine the future of OER. From the article:

Histories are difficult to write for many reasons. One reason is the difficulty of
determining where to begin telling the story – for there is never a true starting point
to a tale woven of people, events and ideas. And just as every historian reifies his or
her bias through choices of the origin and events to be included in the telling, we
freely admit that in this article we see the history of Open Educational Resources
(OER) through the lens of copyright law and open licences.

Supreme Court in India Limits Accreditation for Open University Degrees

The Times of India is reporting that India’s Supreme Court has ruled against open universities conferring postgraduate degrees to students who do not already have a three year degree. From the ruling it is unclear whether the ruling also applies to traditional online degrees as well. VN Rajshekharan Pillai, a former chairman of the University Grants Commission, says:

“We cannot compare an open university degree with a conventional one. They play different roles. Open universities reach out to the lowest strata of society to include poor, underprivileged and dropouts. But, considering the fact that open universities like Ignou are imparting quality education, one cannot undermine the validity of such degrees.”

Supreme Court Revisits Electronic Database Case

Adam Liptak in the NY Times is reporting that the Supreme Court of the U.S. is revisiting New York Times Company v. Tasini, in which freelance writers argued that copyright infringement occurred when their articles were added to electronic databases. The writers won the 2001 lawsuit, and a settlement between companies and freelance writers ws negotiated a few years later. However, the settlement has broken down for those who do not have their copyrighted works registered. The article quotes one group of authors saying:

“With no comprehensive settlement in place,” the brief added, “the publishers and databases will have no choice but to search for and delete whole swaths of freelance works from their digital archives, or risk repetitive litigation over the same dispute the parties sought to settle in this case.”

NY Times Interviews Lessig

Stephen Dubner, contributor to the Freaknomics blog at the NY Times Web site, interviewed Larry Lessig on “copyright, corruption and congress.” Lessig answers a question regarding First Sale Doctrine and e-books as follows:

The First Sale Doctrine represents an important principle forgotten by copyright extremists — that copyright “protection has never,” as Justice Stevens put it in the Sony Betamax case, “accorded the copyright owner complete control over all possible uses of his work.” But in my view, to restrike a proper balance in the digital age, we need to move away from an architecture of copyright law that triggers regulation upon the copy. Instead, copyright law needs to focus on the economically relevant acts that need to be regulated to create the incentives copyright law should produce — and not on the (impossible, self-defeating, and absurd) objective of regulating every time a computer “copies” a work.